Changing views: the past vs. the future

The Namesake Chapters 9-12

After a month, I have finally finished reading The Namesake! I have to say, it is personally one of my favorite books read so far in an English class. I even skipped Tae Kwon Do class last week to read some of the last chapters because I was so glued to the story! Don’t mistake my enthusiasm, though. The last chapters of the book aren’t super exciting or anything (just like the rest of the novel) but it did pick up it’s pace. I mainly enjoyed because of the literary devices that the author Lahiri used to further prove the recurring theme of changing views. In this section, the literary devices were much more apparent and I wasn’t scrambling to find pieces to analyze. The story had a nice flow and it’s use of repetition helped me make a lot of connections.

Through the use of symbols, repetition, and point of view, Jhumpa Lahiri developed a theory on changing views: one will come to despise a quality or object they held dear at one point in their past.

divider_02

Summary:

Before going too much into the analysis, I will begin by breaking down the last few chapters to give you a better idea of what happened. Moushumi and Gogol begin to date more seriously and end up getting married. Moushumi now teaches at NYU after completing the last segment of her PHD. One day, upon arriving at her office, she finds that her secretary has passed away from an aneurysm. Feeling guilty that the secretary is not there to complete her tasks, Moushumi begins to sort her files for her when she stumbles upon a resume with a familiar name on it: a boy she had briefly dated years before when she was still in high school. His name sparks in interest, and she decides to call him. Shortly after that, they begin to have an affair. On their way to Ashima’s for Christmas, Moushumi admits to Gogol of the affair she’d been having, and they get a divorce shortly after. After Ashoke’s death, Ashima decides that she will no longer be living in one place. She will spend 6 months a year in Calcutta with her family, and the other half with either Sonia or Gogol in America. She throws a last party before moving out and (obviously) invites Gogol. He tours his old room and finds the novel that his father had gifted to him years before: The Short Stories of Nikolai Gogol. He sits on his bed and begins reading. The end.

divider_02
Symbol:

When Gogol and Moushumi are married and living together, Gogol discovers the dress she was going to wear when she was going to get married to her ex-fiancee Graham. When he confronts her about it, Moushumi explains:

” “Oh that. […] with a shrug. “I keep meaning to have it dyed.” ” (Lahiri, 230)

I believe that the old wedding dress symbolizes Graham, a man Moushumi loved so much that she believed she was going to marry him. However, that is a thing of the past. Now, that dress only holds heartbreak and sad memories. The dress that she was going to walk down the aisle in, that was so important to her had become nothing but a chore: an old dress she has to dye. The dress helps further Lahiri’s idea of views and how they change over time, as Moushumi’s valuable wedding dress became a simple dress she needed to recolor.

xoncerse
Moushumi’s views of the wedding dress became less appealing over time.
divider_02

Motif:

so-sweet-and-happy-couple-love-photo
before……
It made a lot of sense for author Lahiri to use a recurring concept (motif)  to further the theme of changing views. As in the novel, Gogol’s view of his wife changes and she is seen under a negative light as time goes by, portraying Gogol’s change in attitude about a how he felt about Moushumi.

To begin with, when the couple first moved in together in New York City, they had begun attending weekend parties with Moushumi’s friends.

In the beginnning these occastions hadn’t been quite so excruciating. When Moushumi had first introduced him to her corwd he and she would sit with their arms around each other, their fellow guests a footnote to their own ongoing conversation.” (Lahiri, 237) 

..is how Gogol initially describes attending these events. However, after a while he explains that Moushumi’s devotion to these friends puzzled her. (Lahiri, 237). Gogol had originally enjoyed attending these social events with Moushumi but as time passed by,  he became more and more bored and began to resent these reunions. While still in his thoughts, Gogol also explains that

[Moushumi’s] smoking hadn’t bothered him initially. He liked it. […] But therese days the stale smell of it […] slightly [disgusted] him.” (Lahiri, 237)

Lahiri develops a simple pattern: things that one used found the most endearing in their significant other became their pet peeves about them. The author develops her idea more evidently in the next quote when Moushumi begins to question her whole relationship with Gogol and explains that:

“The familiarity that had once drawn her to him has begun to keep her at bay.” (Lahiri, 250)

In the last few chapters leading up to Gogol and Moushumi’s divorce, the author consistently uses repetition to portray that the qualities that Gogol and Moushumi found in each other had begun to tear their relationship apart. To demonstrate her theme even more, Lahiri also divorces the couple: showing that they had come to despise their relationship and each other, to a point that they had to be separated from it.

mad-couple-black
…after

The motif that Lahiri repeats in this part of the novel, which is the concept that one will eventually lose affection for things that they appreciate, is a strong tool to further understand under which circumstances the theme can be applied to. Yes of course, a theme has to be a statement that can apply to everything, but it helps that the author demonstrates this theme playing out in a real-life situation in order to give the reader a new perspective.

divider_02

Point of view:

Finally, due to the use of the third omniscient point of view, Lahiri is able to show how characters other than Gogol and Moushumi develop throughout the story as she can describe how they feel at any moment. Ashima’s norms of a marriage grow and change throughout the story, and the contrast provided by her original and final view validate once again, the main theme of this section of the novel.

Before Gogol and Moushumi begin dating, Ashima discusses of Gogol’s future plans regarding settling down, getting married, etc. Gogol is not in a rush, but Ashima tells him that when she was his age, she was already celebrating her tenth wedding anniversary, (Lahiri, 191)  suggesting that she believes in long-lasting marriages. However, towards the end of the book, after Gogol announces his break-up, Ashima thinks to herself

“Fortunately they [Gogol and Moushumi] have not considered it their duty to stay married, as the Bengali of Ashoke and Ashima’s generation do.” (Lahiri, 276)

Not only does Ashima’s expectations of marriages alter after time and seeing Gogl and Moushumi’s relationship unravel, the idea itself of marriage becomes less important. As Ashima and Ashoke belong to the generation of the past, they still hold on to their values dearly regarding marriages. As for Gogol, who belongs in the generation of the future, he comes to oppose his parents’ views once he gets a divorce, demonstrating that the change in views can also occur through longer periods of time and through multiple characters and generations as well.

Ilustração - Divórcio

divider_02

Conclusion:

Although the last chapters of the novel had been the ones where I felt the less connected to the characters, it is the section of the book that I have enjoyed reading the most. The analysis I was able to make with the literary devices provided has deepened my understanding of the concepts that can be both applied to the novel as well as real life. I am very fond of this novel and would genuinely recommend it to a friend who wanted a light read, as I believe this book could be finished in a few days. I’d give it a rating out 8/10 mainly because it lacks strong plot in the first few chapters and it a bit confusing at time with all of the flashbacks. Overall, I still really like it though. I hope you enjoyed reading this blog series on the novel The Namesake as much as I have writing it.

thumbs-up-1006172_960_720

I’ll see you soon when I start Gatsby!

 

Works Cited

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Changing views: the past vs. the future

  1. Great analysis. When Ashima said that she can’t leave her marriage, it made me wonder if she has ever wanted to leave Ashoke or did she have other plans for her future. Did you like the ending? What do you think is going to happen in the future? In addition, do you think Gogol would not get a divorce if he had an arranged marriage like his parents?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Olaa,

      Thank you for the feedback. I personally like the ending a lot! Although it was sad to see Gogol and Moushumi get divorced, it was an intelligent move made my Lahiri as it made the story more captivating and realistic! Hopefully, Gogo finds a new girlfriend soon and he can finally fulfill his dreams of living the American life! As for Moushumi, I think she will stick to her nomadic lifestyle, keep short-term relationships, and as Dmitri said to her: ‘break a lot of hearts’. Based on solely my personal knowledge of arranged marriages, I believe that Gogol would have stayed in the marriage but also that Moushumi wouldn’t have cheated in the first place. From the arranged marriages that I know about, they end up working really well because their parents pick carefully an individual that will be compatible for their son or daughter. The couple who gets the arranged marriage also has the choice to follow through with the plans, meaning that they have a deep understanding of the commitment that they are about to make. They are more likely to respect their vows and their relationship that way.

      Lisa

      Like

  2. I love that you broke down the literary devices, and explained why you thought they were important/effective. Is this what you predicted as an outcome for Gogol and Moushumi? I never saw their relationship as very strong, so I wasn’t really surprised that it ended the way it did.
    Moushumi’s affair really paralleled Gogol’s own previous relationships, do you think the outcome of their marriage may have something to do with karma?
    Do you think that marriage still holds the same need for respect as it did in the past? Or has it become a formality that most people choose to overlook?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Jessica,

      Thank you for your nice comment, I appreciate it! I personally didn’t think they were going to get divorced because Lahiri had made such a strong pattern in the novel of failure and non-Indian women. Once Gogol decided to finally date within his race, I thought that the pattern would be broken. However, I was wrong. As for the way it ended, to a certain extent, it can be seen as a direct result of Gogol cheating with Bridget back when he was still studying. Gogol had full knowledge of her relationship and still continued to see and sleep with her.

      As for the last topic, I believe that to many people (not including myself), it has indeed become a formality. The rate of divorced has obviously increased in the last century or so, and the idea of divorce is far more accepted now. I think that the fact that we, as a society, don’t frown upon divorce encourages unhappy couples to continue their life in different paths. In this generation, a lot of couples never even get married! They date and start a family but never get married as they are still recognized as being together. (Common law) As for its important in general, I believe that that depends entirely on your upbringing and family values. Coming from an Algerian background, marriage is still a very sacred ceremony and rite of passage, and divorces are almost non-existent.

      Lisa

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Hey Lisa! Your blogs post are always great! Do you think Gogol and Moushumi’s relationship consisted of mostly of common factors between their lives rather than their actual personality and love? Did you think Moushumi was going to cheat on Gogol? Also you do think Gogol deserved to be cheat on, as he was ‘the other man’ with Bridget?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s